Logging in Europes primeval forest ruled illegal

first_img Email Logging in Europe’s primeval forest ruled illegal Czarek Sokolowski/Associated Press In a ruling issued yesterday, the court agreed that the ministry had not properly assessed the potential impact of the increased logging on the protected habitat, and foresters had erred by cutting trees more than 100 years old and removing dead wood that provides habitat for endangered beetles and nesting spots for owls. Logging also should not have occurred during the nesting season. The court was not convinced that the bark beetles justified the logging.Szyszko lost his job in January when the government shook up the cabinet; his replacement, Henryk Kowalczyk, said yesterday that the ministry will adhere to the court’s ruling. He told Polish radio that he is convening an expert committee to create a long-term plan and find a compromise between forestry management and hands-off protection. Agata Szafraniuk, an attorney with ClientEarth in Warsaw, says the time for compromise is past. “Now is the moment for the long-term solution, which we think is [an expanded] national park.” Szafraniuk says the ruling will have an impact beyond Białowieża by setting a higher standard for forestry assessments. “This is a tremendous change in the whole of forest management in Poland,” she says.Meanwhile, Chylarecki fears that logging will continue in Białowieża. Although the Forest Service has exhausted the logging quota it set in 2016, he expects that it will request further allocations from the ministry before the next management plan begins in 2022. “I don’t believe the foresters will be willing to wait 4 years without any earnings from timber.”Andrzej Bobiec, an ecologist at the University of Rzeszów in Poland, has mixed feeling about the ruling. Although glad the logging has stopped, he notes that the decision says nothing about replanting. Replanting open ground is bad, he says, because the land will eventually resemble an industrial timber plantation, providing less diverse habitat for other creatures.Bobiec also worries that the EU laws are based on keeping habitats intact. This means a future court might be persuaded that foresters are following habitat protection laws when they maintain a mix of species, by cutting some and planting others, in a particular place. It also means that the laws neglect what is ecologically special about Białowieża, which is that its habitats change—driven by outbreaks of bark beetles, for example, or windstorms—on a large scale, compared with other forests in the European Union.Instead of protecting “favorable conservation status,” Bobiec proposes, it would make more sense to conserve “favorable dynamics.” Given the current laws, Białowieża’s wildness would have greater security if it were encompassed by a national park, he says. Europe’s top court has ruled that controversial logging in Poland’s iconic Białowieża Forest is illegal, but the fight over the forest’s future is far from finished. “The controversy over what to do next is just beginning,” says ornithologist Przemek Chylarecki of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw.Białowieża is the best-preserved remnant of old-growth forest that once spanned lowland Europe. Straddling the border between Poland and Belarus, the 1500-square-kilometer forest has centuries-old trees, as well a menagerie—including wolves, lynx, dozens of species of birds, beetles and fungi—found nowhere else. Foresters and preservationists have fought over Białowieża for decades. Ecologists would like to see the forest left to its own devices—as is the case with a small national park at its core—while foresters argue that logging and replanting are necessary to protect against pests and to maintain certain habitats.The latest battle began after spruce bark beetles began to kill drought-weakened trees in 2012. Foresters started felling trees in a bid to stop the beetle, but biologists said the attempt was doomed to fail and would cause more damage than the beetles. In March 2016, Jan Szyszko, the minister of the environment at the time, tripled the amount of logging permitted in one of three districts managed by the Forest Service, ostensibly to speed up the campaign against the beetle. Environmental groups suspected that the motives were economic, and they pressed the European Commission to take Poland to court. Last summer, the Court of Justice of the European Union ordered a temporary halt to the logging, although it allowed an exemption for cutting trees that pose a risk to public safety. Protesters march against logging last August in the Białowieża Forest.center_img Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe By Erik StokstadApr. 18, 2018 , 5:45 PM Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *